<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rudge.tvRudge.tv | Rudge.tv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rudge.tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rudge.tv</link>
	<description>Chris J. Rudge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ancient instincts, modern hardware: paranoia and medical imaging and surveillance technics</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/abstract-%e2%80%98ancient-instincts-modern-hardware-the-vestigiality-of-paranoia-and-its-reanimation-in-the-context-of-modern-medical-surveillance-technics%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/abstract-%e2%80%98ancient-instincts-modern-hardware-the-vestigiality-of-paranoia-and-its-reanimation-in-the-context-of-modern-medical-surveillance-technics%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 05:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranoia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paranoia, said Philip K Dick, is “a modern-day development of an ancient, archaic sense...” Reflecting on Dick's theory, this paper offers a ontological interpretation of paranoia in which medical scanners and clinical surveillance technics are 'paranoiacally' imagined as sources of predatory and persecutorial affect.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/abstract-%e2%80%98ancient-instincts-modern-hardware-the-vestigiality-of-paranoia-and-its-reanimation-in-the-context-of-modern-medical-surveillance-technics%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Invention and the tekhnēcolor labcoat: Scientific history’s psychotropic trace</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/invention-and-the-tekhnecolor-labcoat-scientific-history%e2%80%99s-psychotropic-trace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/invention-and-the-tekhnecolor-labcoat-scientific-history%e2%80%99s-psychotropic-trace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 03:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Psychotropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indeterminacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstitiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaques Derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tekhnē]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This paper examines how LSD — little understood or examined by contemporary science, and almost always comprehended through the lens of its ignominious history — resides interstitially between an unpotentiated tekhnē and an oblique fabula.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/invention-and-the-tekhnecolor-labcoat-scientific-history%e2%80%99s-psychotropic-trace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samuel Coleridge and the Science of the Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/coleridge-and-the-science-of-the-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/coleridge-and-the-science-of-the-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 15:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Literary History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romanticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article examines Coleridge's rejection of certain scientific models of the mind and his avowalment of others. It contends that Coleridge often exhibits a tendency to read neurological models paranoically, and that this tendency stems from his fear that poesy and imagination might be eclipsed by the emerging epistemic science of the mind.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/coleridge-and-the-science-of-the-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assaying a contemporary epistemology of the ‘self-experiment’ with Neil Burger’s Limitless</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/draft-not-for-citation-neil-burger%e2%80%99s-limitless-and-introducing-contemporary-epistemologies-of-the-%e2%80%98self-experiment%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/draft-not-for-citation-neil-burger%e2%80%99s-limitless-and-introducing-contemporary-epistemologies-of-the-%e2%80%98self-experiment%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychotropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dystopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limitless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychopharmacology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Fields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utopia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article serves as a summary and review of Neil Burger's <i>Limitless</i>. It also considers the film's central signifier, NZT-48, a neuro-enhancing drug (nootropic) and a true <i>pharmakon</i> whose positive effects coextend with its tendency to induce deliriant hallucinations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/draft-not-for-citation-neil-burger%e2%80%99s-limitless-and-introducing-contemporary-epistemologies-of-the-%e2%80%98self-experiment%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading psychotropics and &#8216;biocodes&#8217; in Spielberg&#8217;s  Minority Report</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/reading-psychotropics-and-bio-codes-in-steven-spielbergs-minority-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/reading-psychotropics-and-bio-codes-in-steven-spielbergs-minority-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 02:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychotropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dystopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillip K. Dick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utopia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How might a 'posthuman' account of drugs and texts be shaped? Rather than to drugs, posthuman critique has turned to more 'materially technicised' readings of the body. I thus point to a number of 'gateways' by which posthumanism might initiate a proper critical consideration of psychoactive drugs, beginning with my reading of <i>Minority Report</i>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/reading-psychotropics-and-bio-codes-in-steven-spielbergs-minority-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Code and Complexity: Haylesian Computation and Derridean différance</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/153/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/153/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[différance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaques Derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N. Katherine Hayles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critical and semiological readings of code and language—and how they resonate and differ—tend toward 'complexity': both as a writerly modality and as a primary phenomenological subject. In view of this inexorability, this reading considers how 'complexity' might be accessed and/or described by literary and semiotic theory.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/153/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: After The Last Man by Toivo Koivukoski</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/review-note-after-the-last-man-by-toivo-koivukoski/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/review-note-after-the-last-man-by-toivo-koivukoski/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limits of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posthumanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toivo Koivukoski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This review of <i>After the Last Man</i> considers how Koivukoski's book suggests the possibility of a new (and more complete) political reading of the 'scientific' subject(s): from the cyborg, to the chemically enhanced (or dependent), to the clone(d).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/review-note-after-the-last-man-by-toivo-koivukoski/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Computers Can&#8217;t Be: Identifying the links between &#8216;Children&#8217; and &#8216;Experts&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/81/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/81/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyborg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donna Harraway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubert Dreyfus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaques Lacan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N. Katherine Hayles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posthumanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart Dreyfus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mirror Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transhumanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is a computer's intelligence potential 'self-imposed' by environment (software) or 'designed' into the limit of its machinery? In the context of the computer and the 'digital subject', this paper looks at Hubert and Stuart Dreyfus's observations on computer intelligence and the learning abilities of children and adults, the 'novice' and the 'expert'. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/81/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psycholinguistically listening to prozac</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/listening-psycholinguistically-to-prozac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/listening-psycholinguistically-to-prozac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Psychoanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psycholinguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychotropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Metzl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luce Irigaray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prozac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This paper very briefly suggests the possibility of a resurrection of psycholinguistics (and suggests its devalorisation) in relation to the assessment of mental and mood disorders. It does so in the context of a consideration of the emergence, development and epistemic affirmation by the medical science community at large of psychopharmacological medicine.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/listening-psycholinguistically-to-prozac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pervasive Paranoia: American Gothic, Gender, and Narration in Charles Brockden Brown’s Wieland</title>
		<link>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/excerpted-from-an-essay-entitled-pervasive-paranoia-the-american-gothic-gender-and-narration-in-charles-brockden-brown%e2%80%99s-wieland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/excerpted-from-an-essay-entitled-pervasive-paranoia-the-american-gothic-gender-and-narration-in-charles-brockden-brown%e2%80%99s-wieland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rudge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Narratology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychoanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Gothic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Brockden Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eve Kosovsky Sedgwick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix Guattari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judith Halberstam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranoia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ricoeur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigmund Freud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gothic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Unconcious]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rudge.tv/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This essay explores the relation of paranoia and the American Gothic in Charles Brockden Brown's <i>Wieland</i> by initiating, in the Sedgwickian sense, a 'reparative reading' of that text.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rudge.tv/blog/excerpted-from-an-essay-entitled-pervasive-paranoia-the-american-gothic-gender-and-narration-in-charles-brockden-brown%e2%80%99s-wieland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

